The impact of the removal of information and communication technology subjects on students' digital literacy

Authors

  • Siska Lestari Information Technology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Popi Dayurni Information Technology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Laksmi Evasufi Widi Fajari Information Technology Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Kyaw Zay Ya Institute of International Management and Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58712/jcim.v1i1.17

Keywords:

Digital literacy, Information and communication technology, Quality education, Learning, communication and collaboration

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the perception of class XI MA Darul Irfan students in Serang City about the abolition of ICT subjects, and also to determine the level of digital literacy skills of students in class XI MA Darul Irfan Serang City after the abolition of ICT subjects. The type of research used in this research is qualitative. Qualitative research is research that intends to understand the phenomena experienced by research subjects such as behaviour, perception, and motivation through descriptions in the form of words and language. So, in this study, researchers conducted observations, interviews and documentation. The results of the study show that: 1) ICT subjects are very important for students in schools to face the current digital era so that students are not ignorant about using technology. 2) the ability of students to find, manage, and convey information through digital is already high. Student's preparation to take advantage of digital literacy in learning is already high. The ability of students to think critically, creatively and innovatively in the use of technology is still low. Student participation in digital literacy activities is quite high.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Charfeddine, L., & Umlai, M. (2023). ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184(1), 113482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113482

Ganbold, O., Matsui, Y., & Rotaru, K. (2021). Effect of information technology-enabled supply chain integration on firm’s operational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 948–989. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2019-0332

García de Arquer, F. P., Talapin, D. V., Klimov, V. I., Arakawa, Y., Bayer, M., & Sargent, E. H. (2021). Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future challenges. Science (New York, N.Y.), 373(6555), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8541

He, W., Zhang, Z. (Justin), & Li, W. (2021). Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 57(102287), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287

Huck, C., & Zhang, J. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Research and Development Journal, 24(1), 53–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1308731

Litvinenko, V. S. (2020). Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Natural Resources Research, 29(3), 1521–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4

Mehmood, T. (2021). Does information technology competencies and fleet management. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management, 1(1), 14–41. https://doi.org/10.54489/ijtim.v1i2.26

Nanjundaswamy, C., Baskaran, S., & Leela, M. H. (2021). Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Learning. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3881

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288

Potyra?a, K., & Tomczyk, ?. (2021). Teachers in the lifelong learning process: examples of digital literacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1876499

Putra Tampi, P., Diana Nabella, S., & Sari, D. P. (2022). The Influence of Information Technology Users, Employee Empowerment, and Work Culture on Employee Performance at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regional Office of Riau Islands. Journal of Management, 12(2), 1620–1628. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v12i3.628

Säily, L., Huttunen, R., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Kiilakoski, T., & Kujala, T. (2021). Designing education democratically through deliberative crowdsourcing: the case of the Finnish curriculum for basic education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(6), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1857846

Simanjuntak, M. B. (2020). The Effects of Integration Between Kurikulum 2013 and Cambridge Curriculum in English (Study Case Taken From Saint Peter’S Junior High School). Journal of Advanced English Studies, 3(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.47354/jaes.v3i1.77

Sudarmo, S., Arifin, A., Jacob Pattiasina, P., Wirawan, V., & Aslan, A. (2021). The Future of Instruction Media in Indonesian Education: Systematic Review. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1302–1311. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.542

Vod?, A. I., Cautisanu, C., Gr?dinaru, C., T?n?sescu, C., & de Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2022). Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Economics and Social Sciences and Humanities Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(5), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052483

Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Lestari, S., Dayurni, P., Evasufi Widi Fajari, L., & Ya, K. Z. (2023). The impact of the removal of information and communication technology subjects on students’ digital literacy. Journal of Computer-Based Instructional Media, 1(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.58712/jcim.v1i1.17